A MidWestern transgender woman trying to survive in the real life.

Category: human rights

The History of the Word “Woke” and Its Evolution in Modern Discourse

The term “woke” has undergone significant transformation over time, evolving from a phrase in African American Vernacular English (AAVE) to a charged political label. While its origins in Black activism symbolized awareness of racial and social injustice, the term has been redefined and weaponized in contemporary discourse. From its early roots to its current political implications, the history of “woke” reveals much about the changing landscape of social justice movements and the polarized debates surrounding them.

Origins: The Emergence of “Woke” in Black Activism

“Woke” originally emerged within African American Vernacular English (AAVE), where it referred to being awake or aware, particularly regarding social and racial issues. The term dates back to the 1940s, with early uses such as in the 1942 New York Times article that advised readers to “stay woke” in reference to racial inequalities (NPR, 2024). The phrase’s true significance, however, began to take root during the Civil Rights Movement of the 1960s when Black activists embraced the term as part of their struggle for racial justice.

To be “woke” was to be conscious of the societal forces that perpetuated racial oppression, and it was a call to action for those who sought to dismantle these systems. It wasn’t merely about awareness but also about staying vigilant in the fight against injustice, whether it was through activism, community engagement, or policy reform.

The Expansion of “Woke” in the 21st Century

The term gained broader recognition in the early 2000s, especially with the rise of social media and its role in organizing movements like Black Lives Matter (BLM). As movements addressing racial inequality, police violence, and systemic oppression grew in prominence, “woke” became synonymous with activism and social consciousness in progressive circles.

“Woke” signified a heightened awareness of not just racial inequality but also other social justice issues such as gender inequality, LGBTQ+ rights, and economic injustice. In this context, the term emphasized a holistic understanding of oppression, recognizing that issues like class, race, and gender were interconnected and demanded intersectional approaches (NPR, 2023). Progressives began using “woke” to encourage others to be conscious of these societal issues and to fight for equality and justice.

Political Weaponization of “Woke”

As “woke” entered the political mainstream, it began to take on a more contentious meaning. Conservative figures began using the term pejoratively to criticize what they viewed as overreach by progressive movements. This shift was particularly evident in the rhetoric of politicians like Florida Governor Ron DeSantis, who criticized the rise of “woke” ideologies in his campaign against “woke culture” (NPR, 2023). DeSantis, in particular, has positioned himself as a champion against what he frames as the excesses of “wokeism,” often linking it to a supposed threat to traditional values, free speech, and American institutions (Mother Jones, 2023).

The term “woke” was increasingly used by the right to describe policies and initiatives promoting diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) in public institutions, particularly in government and the military (NPR, 2024). In this context, conservatives, including figures like Pete Hegseth, argued that such initiatives were an unnecessary imposition on American values, framing “woke” as an unwelcome force in sectors like the Department of Defense (NPR, 2024).

Conservative critiques of “woke” culture have often focused on identity politics, claiming that it fosters division and undermines meritocracy. They argue that “woke” politics prioritizes group identities over individual achievement and promotes a divisive narrative that stifles free expression. For many on the right, “woke” culture represents an attack on traditional institutions and the cultural norms that underpin American society (Mother Jones, 2023).

The Persistence of “Woke” in Progressive Movements

Despite the right-wing backlash, the term “woke” remains a central component of progressive activism. To be woke today is still to be aware of and engaged with the systems of oppression that continue to shape society. It signifies an awareness of the structural inequalities that affect marginalized communities, including those based on race, gender, sexual orientation, and economic status.

For progressives, the label “woke” remains an important symbol of resistance and a commitment to fighting for a more inclusive and just society. It reflects the idea that addressing inequality requires constant vigilance and a willingness to confront injustice wherever it exists. Far from being a negative force, being woke is about staying informed, compassionate, and active in the struggle for social justice.

The use of “woke” by progressives today extends beyond its original association with race. It now encompasses broader struggles for equity and justice, from climate action to LGBTQ+ rights, labor rights, and the fight against voter suppression. “Woke” culture is, in essence, a reminder that the work for justice is far from finished, and that all individuals must remain alert to the ways in which systems of power shape society.

Conclusion: “Woke” as a Reflection of Societal Struggles

The evolution of the term “woke” from a call for racial justice to a politicized label reflects broader societal struggles over the direction of social and cultural change. Initially a term used by Black activists to signify awareness of racial oppression, “woke” has grown into a symbol of resistance to systemic injustice in all its forms. While it has been politicized and weaponized by conservative forces, for progressives, it remains a term that signifies a commitment to confronting inequality and working toward a more just world.

As debates over “woke” culture continue to intensify, it is clear that the term will remain a flashpoint in the ongoing culture wars. For those committed to social justice, “woke” is more than just a label—it is a call to remain engaged in the fight for a world that is equitable, inclusive, and free from discrimination.

References

Mother Jones. (2023, August 1). Negrophilia, “woke,” and the right’s obsession with Black culture. https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2023/08/negrophilia-woke-right-conservative-desantis/

NPR. (2023, July 21). How “woke” became a political tool for both Trump and DeSantis. https://www.npr.org/2023/07/21/1189016049/woke-desantis-trump-black-culture

NPR. (2024, November 14). Pete Hegseth on the Defense Department’s DEI initiatives. https://www.npr.org/2024/11/14/nx-s1-5191941/pete-hegseth-defense-department-dei

DEI Rollbacks: Impact on Transgender Inclusion and Historical Parallels

The rollback of diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) policies by corporations like Walmart signals a significant step backward for marginalized communities, particularly transgender individuals. These actions undermine the progress made toward fostering inclusive environments, which have historically supported underrepresented groups in navigating systemic inequities. For transgender individuals, such as myself, the impact of these rollbacks extends beyond the workplace, contributing to broader societal challenges that echo exclusionary policies of the past.

According to NPR, Walmart recently announced it would scale back DEI initiatives, including ending racial equity training and reducing its support for LGBTQ+ resources and events (Douglas-Gabriel & McGregor, 2024). This rollback reflects a troubling trend among businesses that had previously positioned themselves as leaders in fostering inclusivity. For transgender individuals, the implications are profound: diminished support in workplace environments can exacerbate existing discrimination and limit opportunities for equitable participation in professional settings.

The historical context of the Chinese Exclusion Act offers a striking parallel. Despite their critical contributions to the transcontinental railroad, Chinese immigrants faced systemic discrimination, culminating in policies that institutionalized their exclusion (Georgia Public Broadcasting, 2024). Today’s rollbacks of DEI policies similarly threaten to sideline marginalized groups, reinforcing societal biases and undoing progress toward equity.

Further compounding these challenges are political shifts that threaten access to essential resources for transgender individuals. For example, recent discussions about limiting gender-affirming care and enforcing restrictive healthcare policies, such as those tied to the Hyde Amendment, could have devastating consequences for the estimated 1.6 million transgender individuals in the United States (Huang, 2024; Smith, 2024). These measures would disproportionately harm those who already face systemic barriers, making DEI rollbacks even more damaging.

Businesses play a vital role in shaping inclusive societal norms, and their retreat from DEI commitments sends a dangerous message. Upholding diversity, equity, and inclusion is not merely a matter of corporate responsibility; it is essential for ensuring the dignity, safety, and opportunity of all individuals, especially those who have historically faced exclusion.

References

Douglas-Gabriel, D., & McGregor, J. (2024, November 26). Walmart scales back DEI initiatives amid political pressure. NPR. Retrieved from https://www.npr.org

Georgia Public Broadcasting. (2024). America’s first major immigration crackdown and the making and breaking of the West. Retrieved from https://www.gpb.org

Huang, L. (2024, November 22). How transgender Americans could lose gender-affirming care. NPR. Retrieved from https://www.npr.org

Smith, J. (2024, November 15). What Trump’s reelection could mean for transgender health care access. NPR. Retrieved from https://www.npr.org

More Hellish than Being a US Navy Seal

In late 2022, Chris Beck, formerly known as Kristen Beck, made headlines when he announced that he was detransitioning. A former US Navy SEAL, Beck had undergone gender transition in the early 2010s, seeking to live as a woman after decades of internal struggle. His decision to detransition shocked many in the transgender community and beyond, raising questions about the complexities of gender identity and the emotional and psychological challenges that can accompany such profound personal decisions.

I don’t have any issue with those who decide to transition to either their original assigned gender or to a different gender role. As Valdes and MacKinnon (2023) point out, the process of transitioning is an intensely personal journey and should be respected as such. However, it is equally important to recognize and validate the experiences of those who decide to detransition. They, too, have the right to be heard and understood without judgment. Detransitioning is often met with skepticism and even hostility, especially in a society that sometimes views gender transition as a one-way path. But as Beck’s story reveals, gender identity is not always a linear progression, and the journey can be full of unexpected twists.

Chris Beck’s military career, including his time as a Navy SEAL, was intense and demanding. He faced physical and emotional challenges that tested his limits. Yet, Beck has stated that his experience with transitioning and later detransitioning was more difficult, more “hellish” than any mission he faced in combat. For Beck, the decision to transition was driven by a deep-seated sense of misalignment with his assigned gender. However, after transitioning, he began to realize that his struggles with identity went far beyond gender alone. As he explains, detransitioning wasn’t an easy choice—it was one born of a painful journey to truly understand himself.

For many detransitioners, there is a combination of external and internal factors that lead to the decision to return to their assigned gender. In Beck’s case, he has discussed feeling pressure to conform to the transgender community’s expectations of what it meant to be a woman. He described being caught between societal forces, medical professionals, and his own feelings of discomfort with how he was expected to look and behave. In a society that often demands conformity, the struggle to reconcile one’s true identity with external expectations can feel like an insurmountable task.

The emotional and psychological toll of detransitioning is profound. Beck has been candid about his struggle with depression and loneliness during this period. He is not alone in feeling this way—many who detransition face similar challenges, often feeling isolated both within the transgender community and the wider world. The decision to detransition is not made lightly; it often involves navigating a complex web of emotional, physical, and social consequences. As Valdes and MacKinnon (2023) suggest, it is crucial for society to take detransitioners seriously, acknowledging the pain they experience while also understanding that their stories are valid.

Despite the struggles that came with detransitioning, Beck emphasizes that his decision was one of self-discovery. He is not rejecting the trans community or invalidating the experiences of others who transition. Rather, he is seeking to align himself with a sense of identity that feels truer to who he is. The narrative of detransitioning is one that is too often ignored or silenced, but it is important to listen with compassion and open-mindedness to those who find themselves on this path.

The journey of gender identity is never simple, and it is crucial to acknowledge that for some, the decision to transition or detransition can be fraught with confusion, pain, and even regret. As we continue to evolve our understanding of gender, it is essential that we honor and support all people—whether they transition, detransition, or remain in the gender they were assigned at birth. As Beck’s story shows, the process of finding oneself can take many forms, and the road is not always straightforward.

The personal story of Chris Beck’s detransition serves as a powerful reminder that the journey of gender identity is deeply individual. For some, it may be more hellish than being a Navy SEAL, but it is a journey that deserves respect and understanding. Just as those who transition are valid, so too are those who decide to detransition. As a society, we must strive to provide space for all voices in the gender discourse, without judgment or dismissal, but with empathy and support.

 

References

Valdes, D., & MacKinnon, K. (2023, January 18). Take Detransitioners Seriously. The Atlantic. https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2023/01/detransition-transgender-nonbinary-gender-affirming-care/672745/

I Am a Transfeminist

I am a transfeminist, because transgender women are women.

I have viewed myself as a girl at a very early age. I was told that I am wrong that I was born a boy. I had to hide who I was. I believed the stories that were told to me that if I did accept that I was a women society would never accept me. I would be viewed as a freak and not be able to find a job.

In my early 20s I came out as bisexual, but soon after came out as a gay man. I rejected calling myself gay because I believed that meant I hated women. I learned this was not true when I befriended some gay men.

Coming out as a gay man did not help with my depression. There was suicide attempts and a self loathing. I knew something had to be done and I finally made the very hard decision to not only come out as a straight transgender woman but to begin the process of transitioning. It was the most difficult decision I ever made in my life but also the most rewarding.

As a transwoman, I have a unique perspective on society’s gender policing: girls do this and boys do that. I didn’t want for society to see me as a boy. I wanted society to see me as a girl. It was – and still is – to get society to use the correct pronouns when talking to me. I experience emotional violence and disrespect when some view me as the correct gender but eventually learn that I’m a transgender woman and they believe I am trying to fool them.

I am a transfeminist because I don’t want to see other women like me go through the same struggles that I have gone through.

The Gender Pay Gap

Jaclyn Glenn

I have a confession to make. I’m an atheist. I consider myself to be an agnostic atheist. I grew up Catholic, but started to lose my faith in my early twenties. I started to become more of a rational person then a person that lives a life based on faith.

I follow some YouTubers that defend atheism. Most of them I don’t care for since they seem to be anti-theists rather than atheists. One person that I do like to follow is Jaclyn Glenn. I don’t agree with everything that she says, but the majority of the time I listen to her I find my thoughts to be the same as her thoughts. One thing I disagree with her is on feminism.

A few weeks ago a video posted by FCKH8 went viral. It features girls informing viewers about feminist points. They give there point across by using the word “fuck”.

Jaclyn Gleen appeared on the podcast Drunken Peasants, which is also posted on YouTube. I personally don’t like to follow the Drunken Peasants; they just annoy me. Yet, I wanted to hear what Jaclyn had to say about feminism. Yet, again I disagreed with her.

The FCKH8 claimed that women are paid 23% less than men. Jaclyn then said:

I get so frustrated whenever I hear this because it is kind of dishonest. I mean if you look at the numbers … you’re not factoring in job choice and hours worked and women, for example, taking maternity leave and stuff like that. If you take all of that out there is still inequality which is bullshit and should be addressed. But, whenever you start adding numbers making it seem more of an issue than it is just kind of bothers me because it is not honest. It is definitely not 20% or 25%, I heard both, it is more like five.

Let’s take this apart and see how honest Jaclyn is with this statement. I will be taking the December 2013 Pew Research Center report titled On Pay Gap, Millennial Women Near Parity – For Now. I’m using the Pew Research since they are a nonpartisan think tank, so there will not be any liberal or conservative bias in their study. It is also the most current information I could find.

I want to take her last statement and figure out where she got the number that women earn 95% of what men earn. The actual inequality according to the December 2013 report is 84%, meaning that women are earning 16% less than what men make. The White House released information saying that women make 77% of what men make, which comes from comparing differences in annual  earnings rather than weekly earnings like the Pew Research Center report. This is where the FCH8 gets there information that the women are paid 23% less than man.

Where did Jaclyn come up with the 5% figure? It comes from Christina Hoff Sommers who says that it is at 5-7% when factors are “adjusted”. She claims that this came from the a 2009 Department of Labor study. I could find no such report. I did find a blog post titled “Myth Busting the Pay Gap” which supports both the 77% or 88% depending on how data is examined. So, the 5% figure is just made up and is dishonest.

Powered by WordPress & Theme by Anders Norén