A MidWestern transgender woman trying to survive in the real life.

Author: Katherine Walter Page 3 of 20

Why LOTRO Still Feels Like Tolkien

Aragorn and Arwen overlook Minas Tirith during a moment of peace following the War of the Ring, reflecting renewal in the early Fourth Age. (Image generated by ChatGPT using DALL·E, 2025.)

One of the most quietly remarkable aspects of The Lord of the Rings Online is the way its epic quest lines are structured. From the beginning, the game has treated the “epic” not as a single, uninterrupted storyline, but as a series of narrative movements—each with its own purpose, tone, and relationship to Tolkien’s legendarium. Rather than endlessly escalating stakes or attempting to outdo what came before, the epic quests unfold more like volumes in a long historical record: moments of crisis followed by moments of reflection, loss followed by recovery, and victory followed by consequence.

This structural choice may not be immediately obvious to a new player, especially one accustomed to modern fantasy games that rely on constant urgency and spectacle. Yet it is precisely this restraint that allows The Lord of the Rings Online (LOTRO) to remain one of the most faithful Tolkien adaptations ever produced—not because it rigidly adheres to canon, but because it understands how Tolkien thought about history, heroism, and the passage of time.

Angmar as seen from Gath Forthnír. (Screenshot from the game, © Standing Stone Games.)

Volume I, The Legacy of Angmar, establishes the ethical and narrative foundation of the epic quest line. Rather than beginning with the War of the Ring itself, the story opens in lands shaped by older conflicts—regions marked by lingering fear, fractured memory, and unresolved loss. This is a profoundly Tolkienian approach. Tolkien consistently portrayed evil not as something that vanishes when defeated, but as something that leaves traces behind: in places, in people, and in stories half-remembered.

Angmar, in Tolkien’s legendarium, is not merely a fallen realm but a historical wound. LOTRO treats it accordingly. The epic quests in Volume I emphasize vigilance, stewardship, and the slow, careful work of preventing old evils from quietly returning. The player is not framed as a legendary conqueror reclaiming lost glory, but as someone engaged in necessary, often invisible labor—protecting fragile communities and ensuring that history’s darker chapters do not repeat themselves.

The entrance to Khazad-dûm after it has been cleared of rubble by the Dwarves. (Screenshot from the game, © Standing Stone Games.)

Volume II, The Mines of Moria, moves the epic quest line into one of Middle-earth’s most symbolically charged spaces. Tolkien never depicted Moria as a place to be “cleared” or restored through heroics alone. It is a realm defined by loss, pride, and the long shadow of choices made too deeply and too hastily.

LOTRO’s epic quests honor this tone by treating Moria not as spectacle, but as memory. The narrative emphasizes reverence over conquest and understanding over triumph. The player moves through a place where greatness once flourished and fell, and where the past is never truly absent. Some things, the story suggests, cannot be repaired—only remembered and respected.

This treatment aligns closely with Tolkien’s broader use of ruins throughout Middle-earth. Ruins are not puzzles to be solved; they are warnings. Moria stands as a reminder of the cost of hubris and the fragility of even the greatest works, and the epic quest line allows that lesson to stand without undermining it through excess heroics.

The meadhall in Edoras, the capital of Rohan, in Kingstead. (Screenshot from the game, © Standing Stone Games.)

Volume III, Allies of the King, brings the epic narrative closer to the War of the Ring while maintaining its refusal to overwrite Tolkien’s story. Rather than inserting the player into the Fellowship’s path, the epic quests focus on the labor that makes such a quest possible: diplomacy, coordination, trust-building, and protection across a fractured world.

This reflects Tolkien’s deep conviction that victory arises not from isolated heroism, but from cooperation across cultures and peoples. LOTRO reinforces this by emphasizing relationships over battles and preparation over spectacle. The player’s importance lies in their reliability, not their renown. You are someone others can depend upon, not someone the world revolves around.

Here again, the epic line reinforces a central narrative ethic: Middle-earth does not need another chosen one. It needs people willing to do the work that history demands of them.

Isengard after the Battle of the Hornburg. (Screenshot from the game, © Standing Stone Games.)

Volume IV, The Strength of Sauron, deepens the epic line’s engagement with Tolkien’s portrayal of evil. Rather than presenting darkness as thrilling or empowering, the narrative emphasizes its weight and pervasiveness. Sauron’s power is not conveyed through constant confrontation, but through pressure—the narrowing of choices, the erosion of hope, and the sense that time itself is running short.

This approach mirrors Tolkien’s moral framework. Evil, in Tolkien’s work, is not seductive because it is exciting, but because it offers certainty, shortcuts, and relief from fear. LOTRO avoids glamorizing darkness and instead portrays it as something corrosive and exhausting. Resistance, not domination, is the defining act of heroism.

The epic quests during this volume underscore endurance rather than victory. Hope persists not because it is guaranteed, but because it is actively maintained.

The Great Wedding of Aragorn and Arwen at Minas Tirith during Midsummer. (Screenshot from the game, © Standing Stone Games.)

Crucially, the narrative ethic established throughout the epic quest line does not collapse when the One Ring is destroyed. Instead, Volume V, The Peace of Middle-earth, does something rare among adaptations: it allows the story to pause.

Unlike every other volume in the epic line, Volume V consists of a single book, A Time of Celebration. That structural choice is itself meaningful. Rather than extending the narrative through additional crises or conflicts, the epic quest line narrows its focus, marking the end of the Third Age with intentional restraint. Most clearly symbolized by the Midsummer Wedding of Aragorn and Arwen, this volume treats peace not as a transitional inconvenience, but as a state worthy of attention in its own right.

The world is permitted to breathe. Triumph is allowed to feel earned and final. The epic quest line acknowledges that an age has ended, and it does so without immediately undercutting that ending with a new existential threat. In doing so, LOTRO mirrors Tolkien’s own narrative instincts. In The Return of the King, the story does not conclude with the fall of Sauron, but continues through healing, return, and quiet reckoning. Victory does not erase loss, nor does it demand escalation to remain meaningful.

There is something profoundly Tolkienian in allowing a volume to exist almost entirely as reflection. Yet it is difficult not to feel that The Peace of Middle-earth could hold even more. Tolkien himself devoted significant attention to the early years of the Fourth Age, exploring themes of renewal, stewardship, and the subtle challenges of maintaining peace. There remains a great deal of Middle-earth left to quietly explore in this moment of transition.

It is my hope that Standing Stone Games may one day return to this volume and expand upon it—not to disrupt its calm, but to deepen it. Peace, after all, is not empty. It is full of stories that deserve to be told.

Modern storytelling often treats endings as problems to be solved, as brief pauses before the next escalation. LOTRO resists that impulse. The destruction of the One Ring is treated as Tolkien intended it to be: an ending that closes one chapter of history even as it opens another.

That distinction matters.

Morannon after the War of the Ring. (Screenshot from the game, © Standing Stone Games.)

From that moment of peace, the epic quests do not rush to invent a new Dark Lord or world-ending threat. Instead, they shift focus. The Black Book of Mordor turns attention to the lingering shadows and unresolved histories left behind by the war, acknowledging a truth Tolkien himself understood deeply: the end of great evil does not instantly heal the world it scarred.

Victory does not erase grief. Liberation does not undo trauma. The land, and the people who live upon it, must still reckon with what was lost and what was broken.

This idea is central to The Return of the King, particularly in the chapters following the Ring’s destruction. Tolkien famously refused to end his story at the moment of triumph, insisting instead on showing the long, difficult work of restoration. LOTRO’s post-Ring epic quests echo this philosophy by shifting the stakes from survival to healing, from conquest to stewardship.

The Keep of Annâk-khurfu in Elderslade. (Screenshot from the game, © Standing Stone Games.)

The Legacy of Durin and the Trials of the Dwarves continues this inward turn. Rather than expanding outward in search of greater spectacle, the epic line delves into themes Tolkien returned to again and again: memory, inheritance, identity, and the long consequences of ancient choices. These stories are not about saving the world, but about understanding it—about what it means to live in the shadow of a deep past and to carry that past forward responsibly.

This is profoundly Tolkienian. Tolkien was, at heart, a historian of imagined worlds. His stories are layered with remembrance, regret, and reverence for what came before. The epic quests honor this by treating history not as lore to be mined for references, but as something that actively shapes the present.

Umbar Baharbêl at night. (Screenshot from the game, © Standing Stone Games.)

Most recently, The Song of Waves and Wind has widened the lens once more, focusing on renewal, rebuilding, and the extension of Gondor’s influence beyond its familiar borders, including journeys south toward Umbar. As the The Song of Waves and Wind now approaches its conclusion with Beyond Telperiën’s Wall, the structure remains consistent: no attempt to undo the ending Tolkien gave us, but a sustained effort to imagine what living forward in that world might look like.

Importantly, renewal is not portrayed as effortless or triumphant. It is complicated, incomplete, and sometimes uncomfortable. Tolkien never suggested that peace was simple—only that it was worth striving for. LOTRO respects this distinction by allowing the post-war world to feel uncertain rather than celebratory, hopeful rather than triumphant.

An adventurer examines maps and records in a Middle-earth study, emphasizing history shaped at the margins rather than the center. (Image generated by ChatGPT using DALL·E, 2025.)

What ultimately allows LOTRO to remain faithful to Tolkien is not strict adherence to a timeline or obsessive citation of the appendices, but an understanding of how Tolkien himself wrote about history, heroism, and the passage of ages. Tolkien was not interested in spectacle for its own sake. He believed that the great events of the world were shaped as much by endurance, mercy, and quiet labor as by battle. LOTRO’s epic quest lines internalize this philosophy.

Tolkien often framed his legendarium as a translated history, full of gaps, regional perspectives, and stories that unfold at the margins of more famous deeds. The epic quests adopt this same stance. The player is rarely placed at the center of history’s turning points. Instead, they are entrusted with work that must be done precisely because the great figures of the age are occupied elsewhere.

This narrative humility is rare in modern adaptations, which often feel compelled to make the audience—or the player—the most important figure in the room. LOTRO refuses that temptation, and in doing so, it preserves the moral texture of Middle-earth.

Tolkien also wrote extensively about the passing of ages—the idea that Middle-earth is always moving toward something quieter, more mortal, and less enchanted. Magic fades. Great powers withdraw. What remains is responsibility.

A village in Middle-earth during the early Fourth Age, reflecting renewal and the long work of peace after war. (Image generated by ChatGPT using DALL·E, 2025.)

LOTRO’s post-Ring epic lines honor this theme by resisting escalation. Rather than inventing a new cosmic threat to replace Sauron, the game turns its attention to inheritance, memory, rebuilding, and unresolved histories. These are not deviations from Tolkien’s vision; they are continuations of it. They mirror the tone of the appendices, where the fate of kingdoms is shaped by stewardship, marriage, succession, and loss rather than war alone.

The world does not end when the story does. It simply becomes harder, subtler, and more human.

Even when LOTRO ventures beyond the explicit boundaries of Tolkien’s published narratives, it remains anchored to his language and intent. The stories feel as though they belong to Middle-earth because they ask the same questions Tolkien did: How does a people endure after catastrophe? What is owed to the past, and what must be left behind? How does hope persist without denying sorrow?

This is why the epic quests rarely feel intrusive. They do not attempt to improve upon Tolkien, explain him, or modernize his themes. Instead, they listen. They treat Middle-earth not as a setting to be exploited, but as a world with its own moral gravity—one that demands patience, humility, and care from those who move within it.

In the end, what LOTRO accomplishes through its epic quest lines is something remarkably rare among adaptations: it allows Middle-earth to continue without diminishing what came before. It understands that fidelity is not about freezing a world in amber, nor about endlessly reinventing it, but about honoring its internal logic—its rhythms, its silences, and its sense of time.

The epic quests do not ask how Tolkien’s story can be topped. They ask how it can be lived with.

That, more than any individual storyline or expansion, is why The Lord of the Rings Online still feels like Tolkien—long after the Ring has been destroyed, and long after so many other adaptations have lost their way.

Disappointed in Senator Durbin

U.S. Sen. Dick Durbin speaks during the Illinois Democratic County Chairs’ Association brunch on Aug. 13, 2025, in Springfield, Illinois. (Dominic Di Palermo/Chicago Tribune/Tribune News Service via Getty Images)

When I was in college, I volunteered on the campaign of Dick Durbin for his first run for the U.S. Senate seat for Illinois. I remember knocking on doors and speaking to voters about his vision for fairness, compassion, and opportunity. Over the decades since then, I’ve admired his consistency, integrity, and leadership. From his advocacy for civil rights and consumer protections to his steadfast defense of democracy, Senator Durbin has been a voice I have long trusted.

That’s why his recent decision to side with Republicans on a measure to end the federal government shutdown deeply troubles me. According to multiple reports, in November 2025, Senator Durbin joined seven other Democrats in voting to advance a Republican-led continuing resolution intended to reopen the government (Sfondeles, 2025; Grisales & Garrett, 2025). While the bill provided temporary funding and back pay for federal workers, it failed to extend the enhanced Affordable Care Act (ACA) premium tax credits—a lifeline that has helped millions of Americans maintain access to health insurance since 2021 (Associated Press, 2025).

The expiration of these enhanced ACA tax credits could cause premiums to skyrocket, pushing millions off their insurance plans and destabilizing the individual health insurance market (Associated Press, 2025). For years, Democrats have fought to expand and secure these subsidies precisely because they save lives. Abandoning that effort, even temporarily, risks the health and well-being of ordinary families who cannot absorb the cost of rising premiums.

Senator Durbin defended his vote by calling the legislation “imperfect” but “necessary” to alleviate the growing strain on federal workers and agencies during the prolonged shutdown (Grisales & Garrett, 2025). Yet to me, this decision reflects a dangerous form of pragmatism—one that accepts short-term political relief at the expense of long-term justice.

Even more alarming is the fact that this measure arose from Republican efforts to hold the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) hostage in budget negotiations (Potter et al., 2025). Forcing millions of Americans to face hunger in order to extract political concessions is beyond comprehension and morally unacceptable. It reveals the degree to which the GOP is willing to use the most vulnerable members of society as bargaining chips—a tactic that, if not strongly resisted, will surely be used again in the future.

The move sets a disturbing precedent: if political leverage can be gained by threatening to withhold food and healthcare from those in need, what moral boundary remains? Senator Durbin, as the second-ranking Democrat in the Senate, had the power to send a message that such tactics would never be rewarded. Instead, his vote may embolden those who see cruelty as an effective negotiation strategy.

I do not write this out of anger, but out of heartbreak. I have admired Senator Durbin for much of my adult life. His record on immigration, education, and reproductive rights remains admirable. Yet in this moment, he seems to have forgotten that principles, not expedience, are what distinguish true leadership from mere management.

Ending the shutdown matters—but ending it on Republican terms and without protecting healthcare and nutrition assistance for millions sends the wrong message about what our values are worth. Illinois Democrats, including several prominent leaders, have voiced similar disappointment, warning that this compromise “is not a deal—it’s an empty promise” (Crisp, 2025).

As one of the people who once proudly campaigned for Senator Durbin’s first Senate victory, I hope he will remember that Illinoisans have long expected moral courage from him—not accommodation. The enhanced ACA tax credits must be renewed, and SNAP must be protected, not weaponized. The lives and dignity of millions of Americans depend on it.

References

Associated Press. (2025, November 10). An emerging shutdown deal doesn’t extend expiring health subsidies. AP News. https://apnews.com/article/2b5ae3651ff16783a00e00dc1ce264bf

Crisp, J. (2025, November 10). Illinois Democrats at odds with Durbin over vote to end shutdown. Daily Herald. https://www.dailyherald.com/20251110/us-congress-politics/illinois-democrats-at-odds-with-durbin-over-vote-to-end-shutdown/

Grisales, C., & Garrett, L. (2025, November 10). Senators, including Dick Durbin, take first step toward reopening the government after historic shutdown. WGLT (Illinois Public Radio). https://wglt.org/illinois/2025-11-10/senators-including-dick-durbin-take-first-step-toward-reopening-the-government-after-historic-shutdown

Potter, D., Franco, M. A., Peters, S., Wooten, T., Stimers, P., Roberson, J. E., & DeLacy, C. (2025, November 10). Senate advances funding bill to end record shutdown. Holland & Knight Alert. https://www.hklaw.com/en/insights/publications/2025/11/senate-advances-funding-bill-to-end-record-shutdown

Sfondeles, T. (2025, November 10). Sen. Dick Durbin facing backlash once again for joining GOP in measure to end government shutdown. Chicago Sun-Times. https://chicago.suntimes.com/us-senate/2025/11/10/sen-dick-durbin-compromise-measure-federal-government-shutdown-end-democrats-backlash

Sutherland, C. (2025, November 10). The eight senators who broke with Democrats to end the government shutdown. TIME. https://time.com/7332610/8-senators-broke-with-democrats-to-end-government-shutdown/

Hunger by Choice: The SNAP Crisis No One Needed

Volunteers prepare food packages at a local distribution center as millions face uncertainty over SNAP benefits amid the ongoing government shutdown. (Image generated by ChatGPT using DALL·E, 2025.)

I write this as someone who served for twelve years as a Senior Program Specialist for the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) at the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA). During my time with the agency, I witnessed firsthand how critical the program is to millions of American families. The system depends on a consistent flow of federal funds, and when that flow is interrupted—as it will be tomorrow—the consequences are devastating.

Beginning November 1, SNAP benefits are set to lapse due to the ongoing federal government shutdown. The USDA announced that it will not issue new benefits because regular appropriations have not been passed for fiscal year 2026 (Associated Press, 2025). The department has stated that it cannot legally draw from the contingency fund to cover regular benefits, even though those funds exist for emergencies (Reuters, 2025).

The USDA maintains an emergency or contingency fund of approximately $5 to $6 billion. That money was created to ensure that families would not go hungry during funding lapses or disasters. Experts argue that the USDA has both the legal authority and the moral obligation to tap this fund (Center for American Progress, 2019). From my years working within the program, I know that withholding this funding is not a technical necessity—it is a political decision.

More than 42 million Americans depend on SNAP each month (Center for American Progress, 2019). If those benefits stop, food insecurity will spike immediately. Local food banks will be overwhelmed, and low-income families will struggle to put meals on the table. The refusal to release the contingency funds ensures that millions will suffer unnecessarily.

In an October 24 memo, the USDA stated that “SNAP contingency funds are only available to supplement regular monthly benefits when amounts have been appropriated for, but are insufficient to cover, benefits” and that “the contingency fund is not available to support FY 2026 regular benefits, because the appropriation for regular benefits no longer exists” (Reuters, 2025, para. 4). However, this interpretation contradicts previous USDA practices. In past shutdowns, the department used available reserves to issue benefits, recognizing the essential nature of the program (Center for American Progress, 2019).

Republican lawmakers have claimed that the shutdown—and the resulting SNAP lapse—is the fault of Democrats for refusing to pass appropriations or a continuing resolution. They argue that accessing contingency funds would be “legally unavailable” or would create administrative chaos (Politico, 2025). These talking points are misleading. The contingency fund is legally available under the Food and Nutrition Act, and the infrastructure for benefit issuance remains intact (Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, 2025). The administration’s decision not to use the funds is political, not procedural.

From my professional experience, I can say that the USDA’s current position is indefensible. SNAP’s contingency fund exists precisely to prevent hunger during political gridlock. To deny families access to food because of an interpretation of funding language is a dereliction of duty. Past administrations, regardless of party, have prioritized feeding Americans even during shutdowns. That precedent should not end now.

By this weekend, millions of Americans will begin to feel the impact. Food banks will face long lines. States will scramble for stopgap solutions. Children, seniors, and people with disabilities will suddenly find themselves without the support they have come to rely on. The suffering that will follow is not inevitable—it is a choice. The federal government must either pass funding immediately or authorize the release of contingency funds to keep SNAP operational.

SNAP benefits should not be held hostage to political posturing. This program is one of the most effective anti-poverty tools the nation has ever created. The machinery to deliver aid is ready—the only missing element is political will. The American people deserve better.

References

Associated Press. (2025, October 30). USDA says SNAP benefits to lapse as shutdown drags on. AP News. https://apnews.com/article/8a52a63b26a707ea676962226b090bb1

Center for American Progress. (2019, January 18). The Trump administration has the power and legal obligation to pay SNAP benefits during the shutdown. https://www.americanprogress.org/article/the-trump-administration-has-the-power-and-legal-obligation-to-pay-snap-benefits-during-the-shutdown

Center on Budget and Policy Priorities. (2025, October 27). SNAP’s contingency reserve is available for regular SNAP benefits as USDA weighs options. https://www.cbpp.org/research/food-assistance/snaps-contingency-reserve-is-available-for-regular-snap-benefits-as-usda

Politico. (2025, October 30). Trump administration faces lawsuit over decision to halt food aid during shutdown. https://www.politico.com/news/2025/10/30/trump-administration-snap-food-aid-lawsuit-shutdown-00630133

Reuters. (2025, October 24). USDA memo says it will not use emergency funds for November food benefits. Reuters. https://www.reuters.com/world/us/usda-memo-says-it-will-not-use-emergency-funds-november-food-benefits-2025-10-24

The Problem with “Owning the Libs”

Illustration contrasting “own the libs” cruelty with progressive compassion. (Image generated by ChatGPT, 2025)

In recent years, the phrase “own the libs” has become a rallying cry for many conservatives. At first glance, it might seem like harmless political banter—a way to laugh at the other side. But taken seriously, this mindset reveals something troubling about how politics is being practiced in the United States. It shows a shift away from solving problems and toward something much darker: treating politics as a game where the goal is to make other people suffer.

The idea of owning the libs is not about making life better for ordinary people. Instead, it’s about celebrating when someone else is angry, humiliated, or hurt. Passing laws that restrict healthcare, rolling back rights for LGBTQ+ people, or undermining voting access aren’t framed as solutions to real problems. They are framed as victories precisely because they upset progressives. Cruelty itself becomes the goal.

But politics should not be about harming others—it should be about helping people. That is the central difference between the conservative “own the libs” mindset and progressive politics. Progressives, at their best, focus on policies that improve people’s lives: expanding access to healthcare, making schools stronger, reducing poverty, and protecting the freedom to live authentically. The success of progressive politics is measured in lives improved, not tears shed by political opponents.

This difference matters because it points to two fundamentally different visions for our society. One vision treats politics as a contest of domination, where the worth of an idea lies in how much it angers “the other side.” The other vision treats politics as a tool for compassion, where the worth of an idea lies in how much it improves the lives of our neighbors.

Of course, no political movement is perfect. Progressives sometimes stumble, and not every policy works out as intended. But there is an important moral distinction between trying to help people and trying to hurt them. If our politics is driven by spite, we will end up with policies that deepen division and suffering. If our politics is driven by empathy, we have at least a chance at building a society that is fairer, freer, and more humane.

The question is not whether liberals or conservatives “win.” The real question is: do we want our politics to be about cruelty—or about compassion?

Page 3 of 20

Powered by WordPress & Theme by Anders Norén